Thursday, 15 August 2013

First Post.


John D’Emilio’s article from 1983 ‘Capitalism and Gay Identity’ explores how the development of capitalism, in particular the free market, has allowed homosexual behaviour to flourish.   He states that over time capitalism has gradually undermined the self-sufficient base of the nuclear family and allowed family members to sell their labour and move away from an interdependent, nurturing family life.  This has allowed the gay community to develop an identity separate from traditional family life. Although D’Emilio raises some interesting points, I disagree with various parts of his argument.

One of the arguments in the article highlights the idea of how capital growth and wage labour has eroded self-efficient, independent and patriarchal family units, leading the way for people to have other opportunities and sexual choices in their life. Although this is true, and gays and lesbians have been able to find autonomy and self- identity, influencing the expansion and development of homosexual communities, wage labour has given other people options also, especially hetero sexual women.

D’Emilio believes that gay men and lesbians were not as prevalent in the past. This statement is easy to disagree with as there are numerous forms of evidence to suggest that erotic actions of gays and lesbians have existed for many centuries in all cultures, it was just suppressed (Weeks, 1981). What hasn’t existed is a ‘label’ for homosexuality or the ability to have gay or lesbian social identity.

Another argument raised by D’Emilio is the strong correlation between years of schooling and lesbian activity. It is possible that women spent more time in education to avoid pressures of marriage, however, there are also various other possibilities that come into play as to why women attended college, for example the strong desire to support oneself economically rather than being dependent on others for your welfare.

While D’Emilio raised some thought-provoking notions about the changing role of the family due to the development of capitalism, his ideas about homosexuality, identity and prevalence cannot not be proven and supported on economic changes alone.  
 
Weeks, J. 1999 ‘Discourse, Desire and Sexual Deviance: Some Problems in a History of Homosexuality’, in Aggleton, P & Parker, R. ‘Culture, Society and Sexuality: A Reader’, UCL Press, London - http://www.femeti.org.mx/femetimgt/img_circular/Cambridge%20University%20Press%20-%20Culture,%20Society%20and%20Sexuality.pdf#page=118 

1 comment:

  1. Hey Emmie, an interesting article hey! I reckon what you've said is right on and highlights the brittleness of his argument (though he's at least one published article ahead of me so who am I to judge!).
    I dig how he's exploring the role of economic development on social/cultural elements of life but he's assertions are, as you say, equally applicable to other members of a society.
    Add to that the fact that he's arguing homosexuality is more prevalent today than in previous times rather than it more likely just being more accepted nowadays than before and it makes for a fairly weak line.
    Regardless, always good to see people exploring ways in which economics can enhance society.
    Cheers,
    Joel

    ReplyDelete